Skip to main content

Most Americans Unaware that CAPS Drastically Limit the Recovery a Plaintiff can Receive from a Winning Lawsuit.


Most people are unaware that statutory caps apply to damages available in Federal Court. These caps drastically limit the recovery that a plaintiff can receive from a winning lawsuit. To put it simply even if a jury awards Millions of dollars to a plaintiff that was discriminated against in the workplace, in most cases that plaintiff's recovery will be reduced to AT MOST $300,000.

Why don't people know this? the media loves an exciting email that sells the seemingly contradicting ideals that a) that David can beat Goliath - a single person we can speak truth to power and win against all odds and b) there is too much litigation, and people are just out to shake down corporations. Otherwise, headlines would look something like this:

Jane Doe wins 127-million-dollar lawsuit against Acme Executive for Racism and Sexual Harassment BUT Damages awarded will be reduced to the statutory limit of $300,000.

Not exactly effective click bait.    

But the truth, in this employment attorney's opinion, is that these laws violate the 7th Amendment right to a jury, support corporate malfeasance, and are outdated and counterproductive to a civil society that claims to be a meritocracy and undermine everyone's right to be free from discrimination in the workplace.

CAPS have been in effect since lobbyist and other corporate interests created the tort reform (deform) law in 1991. The law(s) should be abolished. Even if you support some limits the CAPS need to be adjusted on a regular basis as the amount of the CAPS has never been adjusted for inflation - making a trial by jury even less of a deterrent to those who would break our civil rights laws.

These CAPS ensure that workers who win employment discrimination cases cannot receive a jury’s full award for the harm they suffer. Victims continue to suffer while their employer continues business as usual, undeterred.

To read more please see: End Damage Caps for Workers Now


CAPS legislation: 42 U.S. Code § 1981a - Damages in cases of intentional discrimination in employment | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

If you have information about Dr. Douglas Robinson please contact this law firm.

Gainey Law, PLLC currently represents client(s) related to the wrongful acts of Dr. Douglas Robinson and the Washington State entities that enabled his bizarre and harmful behavior for decades. Despite numerous complaints, the Department of Labor and Industry did nothing to protect Washington workers against Dr. Douglas one of LNI’s highest paid medical examiners. If you received a forced medical exam (IME, independent medical exam) from Dr. Robinson we want to here from you. Please call our office at 206-354-4211.  Despite serious complaints against this doctor dating back years, neither the Department of Labor and Industry nor the Washington State Medical Commission has taken any action agaisnt this doctor.  King 5  Coverage State Paid Psychiatrist Never Held Accountable.  Prior Complaints to the Department of Labor and Industry against LNI IME doctor, Douglas P. Robinson   Date Logged / IME Date Reported by SI/SF Complaint Quality Concern / Concern ...

Workplace Bullying Project

          I just had the pleasure of meeting with the Workplace Bullying Project's founder Lauri Lilli. What a breathe of fresh air for this lawyer. I am so weary of having to tell people I can not help them if they are still employed - because the employer has not taken that final "adverse employment action" or because though they are being horrifically bullied it is not illegal discrimination under the law.  There are no employment police you can call to show up at your workplace and make your boss, manager, supervisory or co-worker stop targeting, undermining, or backstabbing you. The law provides you the right to fight for damages only after unlawful (discriminatory) workplace actions have risen to a certain level of severity or pervasivenes. The case law defines a hostile work environment as harassment that changes the conditions of your job. It must be either severe or pervasive. In almost all cases it must also by based on some discriminatory an...

Angelina Jolie Full Speech at The Hollywood Reporter's Women in Entertai...