Skip to main content

Going back to work?

An excellent article on the issues faced by Washington workers and employers as we seek to re-open businesses during this on-going pandemic can be found here:

June 4, 2020 Update from ESD. Employers and employees are facing some tension about going back to work. For employers it may not be reasonable to bring employees back full-time or at full-pay. For employees who may be making more on unemployment then you will make if you return to work. Especially if your employer wants to bring you back at part-time or at a lower rate of pay then you were making before.

Actually, Scott Micheal from Washington's unemployment department points out that if an employee is brought back under reduced hours from their normal work hours everyone will get the best of both worlds. It is a win for the employer who can more slowly ramp up and safe money on payroll while doing so. It is a win to the employee who will receive the optimal amount of income while securing their job.

For example, a worker who normally makes $1000 a week would get $750 on ESD. If they go back to work at 1/2 time the employer saves on paying the employee for now. The employee still gets paid $500, and they get $350 in Washington ESD and $600 in federal funds for a total of $1450 total. These numbers are not precise and remember the federal $600 has a deadline of June 30. However, this is a net win for both the employer who saves money and the worker who gets more than they would receive either by going back to work full time or by remaining on full time unemployment. 

The House did pass the HEROES act which would extend these benefits to January of 2021. If it does not pass then the extra federal benefit of $600 a week will expire at the end of June and at that time the analysis would also change. At that time, the highest income would result from a return to full time employment. 

Call your Senators, if these benefits are important for you and want to see these benefits extended. https://contactsenators.com/washington 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

UPDATE: Worker sues IME doctor Dr. Douglas Robinson and the Dept. of LNI

10/25/2025: See the InvestigateWest article, IME providers still in the news, still a massive expense to Washington and still allegedly incompetent or worse - read more: https://www.investigatewest.org/retired-docs-earn-millions-examining-injured-washington-workers/  Labor Retired docs earn millions examining injured Washington workers 'This is a wonderful way to make six figures saying no,' said one attorney about Independent Medical Examiners' role in evaluating workers' comp claims. Gainey Law, PLLC currently represents client(s) related to the wrongful acts of Dr. Douglas Robinson and the Washington State entities that enabled his bizarre and harmful behavior for decades. Despite numerous complaints, the Department of Labor and Industry did nothing to protect Washington workers against Dr. Douglas one of LNI’s highest paid medical examiners. If you received a forced medical exam (IME, independent medical exam) from Dr. Robinson we want to here from you. Please call ...

Angelina Jolie Full Speech at The Hollywood Reporter's Women in Entertai...

Workplace Bullying Project

          I just had the pleasure of meeting with the Workplace Bullying Project's founder Lauri Lilli. What a breathe of fresh air for this lawyer. I am so weary of having to tell people I can not help them if they are still employed - because the employer has not taken that final "adverse employment action" or because though they are being horrifically bullied it is not illegal discrimination under the law.  There are no employment police you can call to show up at your workplace and make your boss, manager, supervisory or co-worker stop targeting, undermining, or backstabbing you. The law provides you the right to fight for damages only after unlawful (discriminatory) workplace actions have risen to a certain level of severity or pervasivenes. The case law defines a hostile work environment as harassment that changes the conditions of your job. It must be either severe or pervasive. In almost all cases it must also by based on some discriminatory an...